Watching TV Re-Runs While Digesting Automotive Left-Overs
Okay, it's true. I only watch old re-runs to look at the cars.
Vegetating in front of the television this afternoon, I happened upon a 26-year-old episode of one of the seminal detective shows of my youth – Magnum, P.I.
Yeah, as cheesy as it may sound, I really thought Tom Selleck was cool back then, but of course, the real reason I tuned every Thursday night was the red, perpetually-on-loan Ferrari 308 GTS he drove.
So lying there in the recliner this afternoon, I quickly became sucked in into another wasteful hour of TV nostalgia by the gorgeous red Ferrari, the beauty of the show’s Hawaiian backdrop, and…let’s be honest here…a really hot girl in a bikini (with huge hair).
Anytime I watch an old re-run like this, I inevitably pay attention to the random cars that show up in most every scene shot on public streets.
This particular occasion was no different, as my mind continually tendered thoughts such as “wow, that Audi looks a million years old,” or “my God, how did an ’81 Mustang look that new,“ or even, “why was almost every car back then about as aerodynamic as my house?”
It wasn’t long before Thomas Magnum and his client were looking down on a ritzy country club parking lot filled with all the typical prestige iron of the day.
The classic lines and titanic size of a 1979 Lincoln Mark V was the first car to catch my attention, followed immediately by the ever-boring shape of a 1981 S-Class Benz. An early 3-series Bimmer was there, parked right next to Rolls (or probably just a Bentley, as hey…this wasn’t that nice of a country club). Further up was the “love-it-or-hate-it” back end of an ’81 Cadillac Seville, and beyond that, a white Jaguar XJ sedan.
When everything new is old again
“Hey…wait a minute,” I thought,” as the Jag quickly played a major time-warp trick on my eyes!
For a second, I forgot I was watching an old TV show. It was if this could have been made in 2007, or 2001, or 1991…rather than 1981.
You see, the body style of Jaguar’s “big cat” has, unfortunately, not changed much in the past 40 years. Yes, the car’s platform has changed and it’s engine options have changed…it’s size has changed a little…heck, even the type of metal the body is crafted from (formerly steel, now aluminum) has changed. It’s one hell of a lot more reliable than it used to be (somebody ought to thank Ford for that), and in a world of no hood ornaments, the Jag still dares to be different!
But the actual shape of the car is pretty much the same. Yes, it has evolved, but not much.
There are other cars whose shapes haven’t changed radically since 1981. The Porsche 911 is one. The…well…hmmm…uh…well, again, the Porsche 911 comes to mind.
What Jag calls "classic," the market calls "tired"
Look, I’m not saying that there’s anything wrong with preserving a classic shape. It has certainly worked for the 911 (though the word “evolved” is probably not quite strong enough to describe the changes this body style has undergone since 1963). However the Jaguar XJ is a different story. In September of 2006, the North American market (one of Jag’s largest) saw a total number of thirty-three cars delivered. That’s down 96% from the already-abysmally-low 2005 number.
The formation of Ford’s Premier Auto Group was a terrible idea from the get-go (thanks, Jac Nasser), but even worse was the strategy to go down market in search of sales volume with such laughable products as the Jaguar X-Type (remember the Ford Contour…yep, that’s where it came from) rather than spend the money required to provide real design leadership for the marque’s aged flagship model.
This is just sad, and in no time at all, Ford will either sell Jaguar to a company that cares about its proud heritage, or it will die an unceremonious death. Either way, a 40-year history of a good-but-not-that-good shape will forever tarnish the company’s reputation for otherwise impeccable style.
4 comments:
A lot of people like the classic design because it's readily identifiable as a Jag.
Great point...and I would argue that vehicles like the Porsche 911 (and the Land Rover, etc.) ARE able to survive on that.
However, "classic" looks - be they cars, clothing, or whatever - have a tendency of going in and out of vogue. In an industry expanding as quickly as the car business, there's unfortunately no room for a company that produces a product that's even momentarily "out."
This is essentially the crux of Jaguar's problem, and it's exacerbated by the fact that luxury car buyers, as a group, are typically motivated by all things new and fresh. Yes, a small segment of them will always be enamored of one specific "timeless" shape, but most consumers of this type want to drive "the latest version" of "the big Jaguar sedan" in general...as opposed to the latest version of "the Jaguar XJ's classic shape." Face it, the Jaguar XJ sedan has become just another "moldy oldie."
I think that the Jag has maintained the same basic look because of the designers perspective of "if it ain't broke, don't fix it." They are afraid of messing with a great classic formula. Additionally, I think many hard-core Jag-lovers would be appalled if a new model came out that completely reinvented the nostalgic favorite. The question is, has the styled been preserved out of respect for greatness or for fear of change and failure? I think the answer is that NO CHANGE may produce inevitable failure anyway.
VERY insightful analysis. I would add that the "hard-core Jag lovers" you mention do, in fact, represent a constituancy that the company can't afford to turn its back on; however, at the same time, when constrained to pleasing only this group, the company will never earn enough to survive.
That's where the whole "fear of failure" component sneaks in. Creating a design that would appeal to new, "non-Jag" luxury car buyers - while simultaneously keeping the traditional "true believers" content - would likely result in a compromise pleasing neither group.
Talk about risk!
Back when Jag's parent company (Ford) was raking in the late-90's SUV money, taking chances was less dicey and a Blue Oval bail-out after such a grand new product failure would have been a virtual certainty. As things are now (with Ford fighting for its own survival), any new product that falls the least bit short of a grand slam home run will spell certain doom for Jaguar.
Basically, they're damned if they do, damned if they don't, and any more front-wheel-drive badge jobs like the X-Type will only prolong the inevitable. Time has all but run out for a "real" grand slam product to save the day.
Everything in me wants Jag to pull through this crisis with bold new products that keep them from being "Oldsmobiled" or "Plymouthed." But I'm afraid it's just too late.
Post a Comment