No Stinkin' Badges
I’m convinced that an entire book could be written on the subject of what one could reasonably define as “automotive iconism” – i.e. the cornucopia of badges, emblems, and logos which festoon (to one degree or another) nearly every car produced during the past eleven or so decades.
Yes, I must admit that some of these emblems are indeed aesthetically appealing, and, in a few cases, even appropriate, however the vast majority are automotive eye sores usually serving as nothing more than some marketing department wiz kid’s proposed affirmation to whatever shallow yuppie type represented his or her targeted customer that week.
Back when I sold tires, the company I worked for showed us a training film about “the three different types of high-performance tire customers.”
Customer A was an oblivious soccer mom with a BMW M5 or a Mercedes AMG…she had no clue that she was driving one of the fastest cars on the road and couldn’t understand why her car absolutely required high performance tires. Customer B was a cheap leather jacket-wearing lounge lizard with a rough-running 12-year-old Corvette…he wanted tires that looked cool and would make his Vette somehow “faster.” And then there was Customer C. Customer C was the real deal…a guy with a nearly new Porsche 911 who knew as much if not more about high performance tires as you did and also knew EXACTLY what he wanted. He didn’t care about appearance or gimmicky marketing claims…he just wanted a tire that would maintain the original equipment ride and handling of his high performance car without sacrificing either trait. In other words, Customer C was all substance, no fluff.
It occurs to me that Customer C is the type of guy who could give a damn less about “badges.” His logic? “Are they functional?” “No.” “Then get rid of ‘em.”
And that’s what a lot of those guys (and girls) tend to do. They will often take a heat gun (or hairdryer) to these useless plastic or vinyl pretenses of status or performance, melting the thin coat of glue attaching them to their car’s body and thus creating…a sleeper.
Ah, the sleeper.
The dowdy 1989 Fox-bodied Mustang LX which appears, like all its lowly brethren, to possess only the standard-equipment, anemic four-cylinder engine, but in reality houses the snarling V8 of the mighty Mustang GT…the venerable “5.0” badges removed from its front fenders in an attempt to lure hapless rice-burners into a stoplight drag race.
Or perhaps a mid-eighties Buick Grand National, repainted a different color and with a standard Buick Regal’s hood, wheels, and chrome grille. Such a turbocharged wolf in sheep’s clothing would wreak havoc on any machine unlucky enough to challenge it in any straight-line acceleration contest!
The more modern, more “mature” equivalent of these examples would certainly be a silver Acura TL Type S, de-badged and relieved of its dual chrome exhaust tips for some “under the radar flying” by a driver who wants desperately not to be noticed by his or her local Interstate highway constabulary.
While some people would say that this sort of thing is shallow or immature, I would argue that leaving the superfluous decorations on your ride is no less so. I suppose it’s all somewhat relative, however I can’t help but think about the old “personality versus character” adage (“personality is who people think you are, but character is who you really are”).
As for me, I’ll take a car with character.
Until next time…
2 comments:
In your No Stinkin Badges article, you refer to a car with character
and
link to the 1992 Ford Thunderbird SC... Another car of character choice
would be http://www.germanpartshaus.com/320x240/001673_df.jpg The Fox...
In
1993 it had the same squared off appeal of the early eighties and late
seventies Volkswagens.
I at least the complete article.... But you failed to point out the
hopeless
idiot that thinks putting the 5.0 badge on their LX 4cyl would actually
make
it go faster.
;-)
Good point about the VW's...I also should have thought
of the vehicle the '89-'97 Thunderbird's styling was
inspired by...the mid-80's BMW 6-series (Ford exterior design engineers actually admitted this)!
And yeah, I should have also mentioned the inverse of
the whole badge proposition...I can't tell you how many Ford Rangers I've seen with the "5.0"
badge 3M'd to the front fender!
I specifically recall seeing a backward-baseball
capped teenager revving the hell out of his stripped
white 4-cylinder Ranger (5.0 badges and all) as I was
walking out of a gas station. A good friend (also a gearhead) was
with me and he loudly exclaimed, "Listen to that, Don,
95 wild horses come stampeding to life!"
The kid got pissed off and split, dumping his clutch
at like 4,000 RPM, which was just enough to lay a
pathetically faint 215mm-wide (but only about 4-inch
long) strip of rubber on the concrete.
He was Kenny Bernstein in his own mind, though, and
that 5.0 badge was, to his adolescent thinking, good
for at least another 20 horsepower (on top of the 50
horses he probably though he got from the K&N panel
air filter and it's accompanying "Do Not Discard"
airbox decal he no doubt installed).
I was once automotively young and mechanically
naive...but never out and out stupid like some of
these kids (and adults) are!
Thanks for your comment!
Post a Comment